Victor’s attorney objected to several documents, arguing that the court needed additional time to establish their authenticity.
The judge listened carefully.
Then he addressed Victor directly.
“Mr. Hale, the evidence presented today raises serious questions about your financial disclosures, the ownership of the restaurant group, and the circumstances surrounding the insurance settlement.”
Victor swallowed.
“I have done nothing wrong.”
“That remains to be determined. But I will not allow you to benefit from incomplete disclosures while your wife is being portrayed as someone who contributed nothing to the business.”
The judge ordered an independent forensic accountant to examine the disputed accounts and directed both parties to preserve all relevant records.
He also stated that any request to divide the business would have to account for the original partnership agreement and the evidence of my contributions.
The divorce itself was not finalized that afternoon.
There were still assets to trace, valuations to complete, and legal questions to resolve.
